2020

What Can Work (and What Has Not Worked) in Women-Centric P/CVE Initiatives Assessing the Evidence Base for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism

This study belongs to a larger series of papers from the Royal Institute of Security Studies that seeks to explore the evidence base of different P/CVE efforts. This paper delves into the realm of women-centric efforts in preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE), focusing specifically on interventions targeting women and girls. It emphasizes the deliberate use of "women-centric" over "gender-centric," highlighting the scarcity of literature and initiatives addressing men's roles in P/CVE. The study reflects on international commitments, including UN resolutions, advocating for women's inclusion in P/CVE programs, driven partly by the evolving security landscape shaped by the emergence of the Islamic State. Despite increasing attention, the paper notes a lack of comprehensive evaluation and public disclosure regarding women-centric P/CVE initiatives, echoing broader trends in the field. Critics caution against assumptions regarding women's inherent peacefulness, emphasizing the necessity of nuanced approaches that acknowledge the complex realities of women's roles and relationships within extremist contexts. The study underscores the need for further research to explore gender dynamics comprehensively and advocates for integrated approaches to effectively address the multifaceted challenges of violent extremism.