This analysis challenges the assumptions underlying many PCVE initiatives that focus on mothers as key actors in preventing radicalization. The report critiques the gendered notion that women, particularly mothers, are inherently more peaceful or capable of detecting early signs of radicalization in children. It highlights the lack of empirical evidence supporting such claims and warns against reinforcing stereotypes that undermine women’s agency.
The paper calls for a shift toward evidence-based PCVE strategies that move beyond reductive roles for women. It advocates for nuanced programming that recognizes the complexity of gender roles and the diverse contributions women can make to counter-terrorism efforts. By dispelling myths about women’s roles in CVE, this analysis encourages more inclusive and effective approaches to preventing extremism.